Analyzing Revenge Within Frankenstein English Literature Essay free essay sample

The manner to a catastrophe is you conveying it upon yourself. This is precisely what Victor did to his monster and himself. Victor Frankenstein said the design of his monster was for the better of world, but it s more likely that he did it out of amour propre than for better. Victor said after he made the animal, The beauty of my dream vanished, and dyspneic horror and disgust filled my bosom. That s Victor s first mistake, being selfish, desiring to hold all the power and attending. Possibly Frankenstein created the monster through his ain rejection, non through lab experiments. I think Frankenstein s denial of his creative activity was non because of the expression of it but of Victor s ain weaknesss of his ain life. It s non the monsters fault that he became filled with hatred and the fright of the human universe. It merely became this manner because of him abandoning his ain creative activity, his ain life signifier. We will write a custom essay sample on Analyzing Revenge Within Frankenstein English Literature Essay or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Since Frankenstein was rejecting him he was anticipating to so derive and accomplish power in the creative activity of his monster. Yes Frankenstein wanted to assist for the better of world ; he knew what the effect and result could be. To reconstruct life to human existences is non something to be messing with, your non God. It is hard to place the duties Frankenstein has toward his animal. He did non desire to make a atrocious monster ; he wanted to make life like God but got a monster alternatively. Puting that force per unit area and power into your ain custodies is non something to be running from, particularly if giving it life was your end in the first topographic point. Even if Victor could nt care for his creative activity he should hold had it in a good safe topographic point, off from humanity. In the book, retaliation becomes the reply for Victor and the monster. While these two repeatedly hunt each other for retaliation, they differ than the Christian manner to merely turn the other cheek . Yet it is retaliation in the terminal that gives Frankenstein and the monster a nexus to the topographic poin t they are rupturing down for themselves. Revenge all starts by one small thing. Merely by pretermiting his life signifier he created, made a black retaliation that shortly became an endless incubus. The lone individual that Frankenstein had to fault was his ain ego. It was his mistake that his sister was murdered, his mistake that his male parent died, and his mistake he was killed. All these ironss of events lead to him. After all the agonizing events that had happened he ca nt take it any longer. I had been the writer of inalterable immoralities ; and I live in day-to-day fright, lest the monster whom I had made should commit some new evil. The last consequence was Victor s ain decease. But before his ain decease he said to a close friend Walton, Learn from me. . . how unsafe is the skill of cognition, and how much happier that adult male is who believes his ain town to be the universe, than he who aspires to go greater than his nature will let. Victor did acquire his revenge .A Though, it cost him the most critical thing a adult male can hold, his life.A After looking at the result of doing the animal, it is clear that it was a detrimental pick Victor made. For Elizabeth who ended up deceasing a atrocious decease due to the monster.A Next Victor s male parent death much earlier so he should hold, A and in conclusion Victor s ain life stoping because of the captivation he had on seeking revenge.A Victor ever seemed to hold high purposes, but this clip he truly did nt believe out the consequences of his doings.A All the negative Domino effects of doing theA animal was something Victor neer even pictured. He had no thought what he was acquiring himself into, what a catastrophe that in the terminal, be his life.

Free Essays on Urban Ecology

There are many different theories regarding the study of urban ecology and the development, in particular of American cities. Throughout the years different theories have evolved. The concentric zone theory came first, followed by the sector theory, multiple nuclei theory, and others. When we more recently examined these older theories and applied them to modern cities different ways of studying the ecologies arose. Social area analysis, factorial ecology, and the Synthesis Theory were some of the theories that arose out of this modern thinking. Our hometown of Cleveland falls under many of these theories and modern ideas throughout its urban development. The Concentric Zone Theory was the basis of most of the theories present. The basics of it are present throughout almost all cities of the American landscape. The basic theory is that cities grow like a tree with rings spreading outward. A central business district lies in the middle. The next outlying ring would be ghetto and poor areas. Surrounding this would be transitional housing between poor and middle class. Next would be middle class housing. Surrounding that is more upper class homes, and commuters. This basic analysis is evident throughout but it doesn’t take many things into account. Social structures were not discussed. Competition varies in city to city depending on type of industries, etc. Also all cities are not based on the same form of transportation such as New York or Washington D.C. with their subways vs. Detroit or Columbus which have none. The next two theories evolved out of the flaws of the Concentric Theory. The Sector Theory looked closer at areas, block by block. Pie shaped or wedge shaped areas arose. Many ethnic groups were in districts together. New York’s Chinatown and New Orleans French Quarter are examples. It noticed how these districts of rich and poor would sometimes be within a block of each other. Also these districts ... Free Essays on Urban Ecology Free Essays on Urban Ecology There are many different theories regarding the study of urban ecology and the development, in particular of American cities. Throughout the years different theories have evolved. The concentric zone theory came first, followed by the sector theory, multiple nuclei theory, and others. When we more recently examined these older theories and applied them to modern cities different ways of studying the ecologies arose. Social area analysis, factorial ecology, and the Synthesis Theory were some of the theories that arose out of this modern thinking. Our hometown of Cleveland falls under many of these theories and modern ideas throughout its urban development. The Concentric Zone Theory was the basis of most of the theories present. The basics of it are present throughout almost all cities of the American landscape. The basic theory is that cities grow like a tree with rings spreading outward. A central business district lies in the middle. The next outlying ring would be ghetto and poor areas. Surrounding this would be transitional housing between poor and middle class. Next would be middle class housing. Surrounding that is more upper class homes, and commuters. This basic analysis is evident throughout but it doesn’t take many things into account. Social structures were not discussed. Competition varies in city to city depending on type of industries, etc. Also all cities are not based on the same form of transportation such as New York or Washington D.C. with their subways vs. Detroit or Columbus which have none. The next two theories evolved out of the flaws of the Concentric Theory. The Sector Theory looked closer at areas, block by block. Pie shaped or wedge shaped areas arose. Many ethnic groups were in districts together. New York’s Chinatown and New Orleans French Quarter are examples. It noticed how these districts of rich and poor would sometimes be within a block of each other. Also these districts ...

Discussion Questions VI Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Discussion Questions VI - Essay Example Market segmentation is a division of the population of consumers into identifiable segments. So within each segment are people with shared characteristics. This makes it easier to identify their needs and wants and identify market opportunities, as the purpose of a segmentation system is to target consumers better. This can affect the product, price, promotion and place in the marketing strategy. One of the determinants of the effectiveness of such an approach is the homogeneity of the segment in terms of consumer behavior. â€Å"The process by which managers make decisions about segmentation in the international consumer market† (Craft, 2004) is therefore an important part of the strategy of segmentation. Segmentation can be made along geographic, demographic, economic, technological or cultural lines. Multinational and global market challenges in any segment must be faced with strategic planning considerations. We shall discuss these in relation to segmentation based on cultural differences and analyze product branding, advertising and promotion for different cultural segments with rationale and examples. A segmentation system based on culture divides consumers according to their customs and traditions, language, beliefs, values, religion, and so on. Subcultures can also be a consideration for further precise segmentation. These aims affect strategic planning considerations involving â€Å"market demographics, sales channels, operational implementation, and adaptable approaches to niche markets currently being served or targeted.† (Bauman, 2002) Planning enables the decision makers to see greater opportunities arising out of the non-traditional core markets. It also makes them evaluate their core competencies, skill sets, product development, competitive advantages, and so on. This then also has implications â€Å"for functional tasks such as the sales planning and advertising† (Dix, 2002) and product branding. Product branding in China presents a